Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
4.
Public Health ; 214: 96-105, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2159740

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the views of public health experts on adverse trends in life expectancy across England and Wales over the past decade, causal factors, possible solutions, and their opinions about how the prepandemic situation influenced the UK's COVID-19 response. STUDY DESIGN: Semistructured, in-depth interviews. METHODS: Nineteen public health experts were identified by purposeful sampling and invited to take part via e-mail. Sixty-three percent responded and participated (n = 12), six females and six males. Interviews took place via Microsoft Teams between November 2021 and January 2022. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: There was no consensus on the significance of the stalling and, at some ages, reversal of previous improvements in life expectancy between 2010 and 2020. Explanations offered included data misinterpretation, widening health inequalities, and disinvestment in public services, as well as some disease-specific causes. Those accepting that the decline was concerning linked it to social factors and suggested solutions based on increased investment and implementing existing evidence on how to reduce health inequalities. These interviewees also pointed to the same factors playing a role in the UK's poor COVID-19 response, highlighting the need to understand and address these underlying issues as part of pandemic preparedness. CONCLUSIONS: There was no consensus among a group of influential public health experts in the UK on the scale, nature, and explanations of recent trends in life expectancy. A majority called for implementation of existing evidence on reducing inequalities, especially in the wake of COVID-19. However, without agreement on what the problem is, action is likely to remain elusive.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Public Health , Male , Female , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , England , Life Expectancy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care
5.
BMJ ; 378: o1883, 2022 07 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1973823
6.
BMJ ; 377: e071329, 2022 05 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1854272
7.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 44(4): e499-e505, 2022 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1752172

ABSTRACT

Improvements in life expectancy at birth in the UK had stalled prior to 2020 and have fallen during the COVID-19 pandemic. The stagnation took place at a time of relatively high net migration, yet we know that migrants to Australia, the USA and some Nordic countries have positively impacted national life expectancy trends, outperforming native-born populations in terms of life expectancy. It is important to ascertain whether migrants have contributed positively to life expectancy in the UK, concealing worsening trends in the UK-born population, or whether relying on national life expectancy calculations alone may have masked excess mortality in migrant populations. We need a better understanding of the role and contribution of migrant populations to national life expectancy trends in the UK.


Subject(s)
Life Expectancy , Transients and Migrants , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL